Every day you pick up a newspaper or turn on the TV, you cannot avoid seeing ads for a range of drugs including sleeping pills. It seems like the pharmaceutical industry still has money to burn even though we are going through a recession. What’s going on? Well, it’s all to do with building up and then maintaining the brand. Marketing has become increasingly scientific. Focus groups are brought together and polled on what features for a product are the most important, how much we would pay for it, what we think about this slogan for selling it, and so on. The intention is to design an advertising campaign that will tell us what we most want to know about a product, explain why it’s great value for money, and so on, all in the most memorable of prose and, on TV, backed up by the latest music from a top singer or group. That way, when we do fall ill, we can walk in to see our physician and ask for the drug we want by name. Except, we are all likely to forget a product’s name. So the marketers endlessly repeat it wherever we go to reinforce brand awareness. Like Pavlov’s dog who was taught to react when a bell rang, we are taught to respond with the leading brand name whenever a product type is mentioned.
Is it like this everywhere? Well, no. In the majority of other countries around the world, manufacturers are not allowed to market drugs directly to consumers. All the promotional effort is focussed on the medical profession. The reason is simple. When there is a choice between several drugs as a treatment for a particular condition, only a doctor is able to say which is the best for a particular patient. There are always costs and benefits in every drug and people have different medical histories and needs. There is no one-size fits all treatment for every person. In the US, the FDA has a special division tasked to keep advertising reasonably fair and honest. That’s why, when you have a forty second ad on TV, thirty seconds is a voice listing the adverse side effects. The FDA thinks you should know the problems with each drug so you can make an informed decision on which is the best. Except listing all these side effects is bad for business. People are put off. That’s what makes the latest round of ads so interesting.
The manufacturers of ambien have been running a new series of ads talking about the problems of insomnia but not mentioning any drug by name. Because no drug is mentioned, there is no need to list side effects. Everything can remain very positive. At the end of the ads, you are referred to www.silenceyourrooster.com where you read all about the drug and are offered a free trial. The question we have to ask is simple. As a nation, we are increasingly dependent on ambien to get us to sleep and keep us sleeping through the night. Is this desirable? Should we rely on a drug to help us sleep or look for a better way of getting a good night’s rest? The FDA is right. It’s your choice.
February 13th, 2010 in
Uncategorized |
No Comments
Erectile Dysfunction is defined as consistent problem in achieving and maintaining an erection suitable for successful penetrative sex. Erectile dysfunction is also known as male impotence. But having this problem rarely doesn’t mean you have ED. One of the factors is consistency, and if a person experiences erection problems in more than a quarter of his overall sexual activities that can be called impotence.
It is easy to be sexually motivated. Sexually stimulated is easy to be too. But to lead your own body to an erection is something people with erectile dysfunction issue are incapable of. We can’t control the way our body works mainly because we are not programmed robots. If we were that it would be ideal for us as we would give different commands to ourselves and experience only joy. But this is life and we are humans. Human have lots of health troubles. Erectile dysfunction is one of those misfortunate circumstances that men meet on their way.
Erectile dysfunction is not a one-minute event that just occurred. It is something that has been around always and men wanted to overcome this problem many centuries. There are multiple medical solutions of erectile malfunctioning. Some of them can be collected in the fields (herbs), but most of them should be purchased from a drug-store. Some people prefer to do yoga and extreme surgeries that place implants in penis but that is all unnecessary because one pill should be enough to solve the erectile dysfunction issue every night you want to have sex. When we hear the word “pill” we tend to get a little cautious. We imagine having side-effects or lack of the result. But before these thoughts enter your head – stop them. Nowadays market is full of erectile dysfunction pills that are totally safe and efficient.
Most of the drugs that are present on the US market are FDA approved. They are to be consumed orally or be injected directly into the reproductive organ of the man. We want to tell you about the number one selling erectile dysfunction fighter in the country – it carries the name: Cialis.
Cialis is the longest lasting erectile tablet that is meant for men that are unable to maintain sexual act and perform an orgasm. It is for those who stopped receiving sexual pleasure and want to add some romantic feel to the process of love making. The recommended dose of Cialis is 10mg. The pill should be taken 30 minutes before the intercourse. The effectiveness of the medication is unbelievable as it can still be effective 36 hours after the pill consumption. Pretty incredible that is, isn’t it?
But you should remember to take this drug seriously. Don’t think you can purchase it just to try out. It has some side-effects that you might not want to test. Usually Cialis is available with a prescription and we would advice you to visit a doctor, have a good long chat with him and decide whether you should or should not order the drug. If happen to choose between the brand and generic variant of the remedy it is always better to go for the generic version. But don’t think they make the world of difference. They will both help you significantly and lift your spirits up high when it comes to sex. Sex is supposed to bring you pleasure and only pleasure; don’t ever make yourself believe anything else. That is the only thing that is really true.
February 13th, 2010 in
Uncategorized |
No Comments
Let’s assume we could talk the health insurance industry into paying for treatment focussed on the patient and not on the profitability of the hospitals and the pharmaceutical industry. What would a pain management department look like and how would it treat its patients? First off, it would concentrate all its energies on two quite different functions. Before you can identify the best treatment for a patient, you must diagnose the underlying cause of the pain. The most experienced diagnosticians in the hospital or clinic must therefore work on each patient, using whatever reasonable tests are necessary to reach a reliable diagnosis. The second function is to switch the emphasis on the types of treatment made available. At present, hospitals are run for profit and so base all their treatment decisions on what generates the most profit. In other countries, there is an evidence-based approach. Researchers identify which treatments are the most cost-effective for relieving the patient’s problem and only those treatments are used regardless of the level of profitability.
Once the hospital has a reliable diagnosis, it moves to the treatment phase. This may be an interventional procedure to repair damage or relieve the cause of pain. In the case of surgery, there are new less invasive methods. Where surgeons have the experience and the evidence shows good outcomes are likely, they should be used. If invasive procedures are not recommended or require follow-up, we move into the area of physical therapy, psychological counseling, cognitive behavioral therapy and general support services. Here the team aims to teach each patient how to cope with the new physical limitations and the reality of persistent pain. All the research both in the US and in the rest of the world shows these services are the most likely to improve the patient’s quality of life. Pain management is as much about the patient’s attitude and emotions as it is about the treatment given. Then we get into all the alternative therapies. Again there is excellent research evidence showing that acupuncture and some homeopathic therapies produce excellent results. If there is such evidence available, the hospital or clinic should supply it. Finally, the doctors need to give detailed advice to patients about what drugs to use and when to use them.
In all this, the pain management department is aiming at a simple target. It wants the best long-term result for the patient without relying on the use of drugs. Although there will be some reliance on painkillers like tramadol during the early part of the treatment program, pain management assumes dependence on drugs is a bad thing. People should learn how to make the best of life without relying on pills. So you can buy tramadol online for use in the early stages but be prepared to learn how to management and control your pain without its help. In the long term, this saves you from the continuing cost of having to buy the drugs and it also makes you a stronger person. Ignoring all the stereotypes about the stoic people who live with pain, people with the strength of mind to manage their own feelings and emotions generally make better lives for themselves. People who see a pill bottle as the only solution are weak, passive and rarely make anything of their lives.
February 8th, 2010 in
Uncategorized |
No Comments
For these purposes, we need to start off with a basic definition. Pain is nothing more than a message sent by the affected part of your body to the brain saying you are injured. It’s useful when it first alerts you to an injury or disease. It’s a problem in its own right when it will not shut down and let you get on with your life. Doctors distinguish between two types of pain: acute pain is where an injury or illness can be cured so the pain will slowly fade as the treatment of the cause takes effect, and chronic pain where the injury or disorder will continue to cause you pain over a long period of time. It’s not so hard to remain optimistic and positive when the pain is acute. You know you will get better. It’s a different psychological battle when the pain is chronic. This is life-changing and many people react by feeling some degree of depression.
In an ideal world, everyone suffering from chronic pain would be given personal attention. Specialists from all the different areas of medicine would form a team to investigate your condition and then prescribe the best set of responses. Unfortunately, this is not possible. The career path for physicians assumes the best will become specialists and rise through the ranks to lead a team of specialists. Status will be decided by the number of people in the team or department the doctor ends up running. For pain management to work effectively, this structure of separate kingdoms has to be dismantled and everyone works together in teams centered on individual patient needs. No more empire building and politics. Doctors supply the most effective treatments based on a diagnosis of the underlying cause of the pain. Take back pain as an example. If the hospital works together, the relevant tests can be performed. Let’s assume the cause is found to be a herniated disk. The recommended treatment is a steroid injection and physical therapy. A caring hospital might also throw in some counseling and support to encourage the patient to make the best possible recovery. In this model, diagnosis drives the choice of treatment. In the world now, the doctors first choice of action is a painkiller to relieve your suffering. No doubt this could be seen as caring. In reality, it’s the most cost-effective way of persuading the patient to go home and allows the hospital to claim the maximum amount from the health insurance company. A separate pain management department in a hospital is labor intensive and less profitable. They do exist but only in a few cities.
This leaves pain management in the hands of the pharmaceutical industry. Fortunately, the research and development teams have come up with a world’s best painkiller. It’s called tramadol – one of the so-called opiates which gives you good pain relief without many of the adverse side effects from a full opiate. A vast amount of practical experience proves this drug gives effective relief from moderate to severe pain. If you are facing chronic pain, buy tramadol online and find an improvement to your life. But always remember you should not become dependent on any drug. Ignoring the expense of buying these pills for the rest of your life, there are physical costs in using drugs over long periods of time. There are better ways of managing your pain without drugs.
February 8th, 2010 in
Uncategorized |
No Comments
One of the problems for anyone taking an interest in health matters is to keep everything in proportion. Wherever you look, it can look as if there is bad news. It’s easy to get down. So all new information has to be carefully balanced before deciding whether to act on it. Let’s start with a piece in this December’s issue of European Urology. A team in Italy recruited some 350 men aged between 18 and 60 all of whom had been diagnosed with some degree of male infertility which includes a range of sexual problems from erectile dysfunction, failure to ejaculate, low sperm counts, and so on. These men were measured over time against a similar number of fertile men with an active sex life. The results make slightly depressing reading. There is evidence that men who have sexual problems, no matter what the cause, are more likely to encounter serious health problems. The study specifically excluded cancer because the study did not run long enough to determine the odds of men being diagnosed with malignant growths. But, using the Charlson Comorbidity Index, men with fertility problems were more prone to the 22 serious disorders listed in the Index. This research goes further than simply linking infertility to heart disease. It predicts men with infertility problems will die significantly younger than men with full fertility unless they receive fairly aggressive preventative treatment.
Before we all get panicky, we need to understand the significance of the results. This is a small sample study. With a total of less than 700 men participating, this is not sufficiently significant to scale up the results to the whole population. Thousands of participants are required before a statistical link can be made to general trends. But this is a wake-up call to the research community. If large-scale trials confirm this finding, it will require a major rethink about the significance of all types of male infertility as predictors of more serious health problems to come. The current guidelines given to all doctors is to treat all men reporting erectile dysfunction as heart patients until the negative is proved. That means the moment you walk through the door, you will be asked for blood and urine samples, and subjected to a battery of tests to eliminate heart disease. The extent of this testing could become really intensive if the Italians are proved correct.
The moral of this research is simple. Erectile dysfunction can be the first symptom of one of a number of serious disorders and diseases. So, although you could just buy cialis online and self-medicate, the risk is not worth it. You should always go and have a full check-up. If your doctor gives you a clean bill of health, the cialis will cure your immediate problems. But if evidence of potential serious illness is found, you just saved your life. This is your choice. Restore your erections for a short time or extend your life by a decade and more by having early treatment for those otherwise fatal diseases and disorders. Yes, this may well mean spending money – those pesky health insurance policies often exclude consultations and the treatment of erectile dysfunction. But spending money or making those copayments could be the best value-for-money deal you can make.
February 3rd, 2010 in
Uncategorized |
No Comments
The recent studies on Tadalafil, a medication that was initially developed for treating erectile dysfunction, have shown that the drug is also quite beneficial for patients diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension.
The primary cause for pulmonary hypertension is the increased blood pressure within the arteries, which deliver blood to the lungs. Patients with such a condition often experience symptoms of dizziness, sleepiness, and being short of breath due to the decreased supply of oxygenated blood throughout the body, which is caused by the increased tension and lower rates of oxygen intake by blood vessels that are under high pressure.
Dr. Robyn J. Barst of Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons in New York City, who was the head of the clinical study on the effects if Tadalafil, stated that the drug has shown a very effective improvement on the blood-circulation aspects of the diseases and was highly tolerated by test subjects as well.
The study comprised 405 patients diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension of various degrees of severity, divided into groups who were given Tadalafil, placebo and Tracleer – a common and effective medication used in cases of pulmonary hypertension.
The results of the studies have informed that after the first 16 weeks of the experiment, patients who were taking Tadalafil have experienced delay in their condition worsening that made them seek medical attention, and has prolong the periods of time that they could safely undertake physical activity, without addressing special medications.
Moreover, the drug has improved the overall output of the heart and decreased the blood vessel tension as compared to the initial data at the start of the experiment.
The results of the study have encouraged the scientists to address the Food and Drugs Administration for reviewing Tadalafil and recommending its use in cases of pulmonary hypertension, besides the usual employment in cases of erectile dysfunction. This could be great news for those patients who were looking for effective alternatives to common pulmonary hypertension medications, being unable to cope with their side-effects.
Before Tadalafil, which is also known by its brand name Cialis, doctors have undertaken tests with other common erectile dysfunction treatment, Sildenafil (Viagra). The results of the study were also quite positive and led to the approval of the drug for use in cases of pulmonary hypertension by the FDA. The only downside was that the drug should be taken three times a day, and being at least not quite convenient it has proven to be quite a costly alternative to common medications.
Form that point of view Cialis, being a more effective drug for treating erectile dysfunction with a much longer half-life than other similar medications such as Levitra and Viagra, has also proven to be more beneficial for addressing pulmonary hypertension as it required to be taken quite less often than its counterparts. So we can expect a boom in online Cialis sites in the near future, which are aimed at not only treating erectile dysfunction but also selling the drug to those people, who were diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension.
February 3rd, 2010 in
Uncategorized |
No Comments
In the days before the “pills” came on to the market, no-one knew how many men suffered from erectile dysfunction. Now that men are slightly more honest about their sexual experiences, it’s possible to get a better count of the number affected. The emerging evidence from continuing research projects confirms the traditional view that, as men age, they grow more likely to experience some degree of erectile dysfunction. If you go back fifty years, life expectancy in the US was less than spectacular with the majority of men dying in their sixties. Today, the average life expectancy is creeping up through the seventies (it’s over eighty for women). So when we read that men over the age of seventy are the most likely group to experience erectile dysfunction, this is now viewed as a more serious social problem. People who are building up to retirement expect to enjoy some leisure time (which includes sex). They have saved up and, as soon as their 401k accounts have recovered from the battering they took during the recession, the boomers will quit their jobs and look for a little fun. How will they get on?
There have been two recently published medical studies into the relationship between age and sexual activity. In one sense, they say nothing new, fitting into our expectations. But they are useful confirmation of basic common sense. The first looks at patterns of sexual activity as men age. Those in stable relationships report that activity levels off after the first few years of lust. For a variety of reasons, some men find that sex slows down and stops. This can be because their partners fall ill or die. Following death, they do not immediately go out on to the singles scene. But levels of libido can change around the time of the menopause. Habits and interests also change. The researchers confirm that men who fail to engage in regular sex can find difficulties later on. Muscles lose their tone. The spongy tissue inside the penis breaks down and cannot absorb enough blood to form a hard erection. Performance anxiety is the final nail in the coffin. The second piece of research confirms that men who exercise regularly and keep fit also enjoy a better sex life. In part, this is keeping the body healthy and the blood circulation at better levels. But it’s also about attitude. They have a better quality of life and find sex more enjoyable.
For an older man, this is encouraging news. For those prepared to make time for regular exercise, the fear of poor sexual performance will recede. You will look good, feel better and find sex great. For those who lack the motivation to leave the couch, this is discouraging news. If you still expect regular sex, you should think about laying in a supply of levitra – just in case. All the evidence from the clinical trials shows this medication is the strongest of the drugs on the market. It has the best results in older men, particularly where there may have been some damage from surgery or a disease like diabetes. To set aside any performance anxiety, buy levitra to keep your self-confidence high and your sexual activity at its most satisfying.
January 31st, 2010 in
Uncategorized |
No Comments
It’s easy to get the impression the FDA does very little to protect the American consumer. When you look back at this last year, there have been an alarming number of problems with produce causing food poisoning, there have been new warnings about household-name drugs, and several refusals by the management team to follow the scientific evidence to ban or limit the use of various medical devices and products on the market. But, in one area at least, the FDA does take its role seriously. Put another way, there is sufficient funding given to this division to allow it to carry out its duties effectively. So, when you browse around the news media in both printed form and on the internet, the FDA monitors how drugs and devices are marketed. If there is evidence the ads are not properly balanced or actually misleading, the manufacturer and distributor can be ordered to change the wording. In this, one of the key considerations is whether the public are given adequate warning of the possible side effects from taking medications. That’s why, when you sit through a fifty-second commercial on television, you get the voice-over spending most of the time listing the possible problems.
One of the more controversial series of ads sells male enhancement products. This is a wonderful way of describing a range of pills, powders, liquids, lotions and creams a man may consume, splash on or rub into his penis to produce a longer, harder erection with more semen and a general improvement in the level of satisfaction achievable at orgasm. One school of thought thinks these ads come close to obscenity but, thanks to the First Amendment, the right of free speech prevails and often explicit wording is allowed to stand. In the midst of all these ads competing for your attention were those praising the merits of Stiff Nights – no doubt what this product was promising to provide. Perhaps surprisingly, all the users found this “all natural dietary supplement” to be highly effective. The manufacturer was shipping an increasing number of units all around the world as its fame spread by word-of-mouth. But the FDA was hot on their trail as lab tests came up with a list of the actual ingredients. The standout was sulfoaildenafil. This is one of the generic compounds almost identical to the brand name drug levitra. In other words, the reason for this product’s amazing success was that it was mixing in a highly effective medication.
This gave the lie to its advertizing copy which claimed Stiff Nights was “all natural”. Why should this matter? Well, like its branded equivalent, sulfoaildenafil reduces blood pressure. If it is taken at the same time as any other drug containing a nitrate, this can produce fainting and a coma. So, in a blaze of publicity sent around the world, Stiff Nights joins the list of some 28 other “natural” enhancement products banned by the FDA since 2004. If you see it or any other comparable male product advertized on the internet, ignore the claims. There is nothing out there that comes close to matching the effectiveness of the erectile dysfunction medications. In full-scale clinical trials, the FDA has been convinced of the safety and effectiveness of these drugs. Buy levitra and find out why this is considered the most powerful of all the erectile dysfunction drugs.
January 31st, 2010 in
Uncategorized |
No Comments
It seems the imagination of the folk who work for TV corporations is limited to the same basic formula. Reality shows are big business. If you want to earn the maximum revenue from selling ad space on TV, have a group of regular people running round the world doing silly things in a search for one million dollars or follow a group of families as they compete against each other to see who can lose the most weight. In these shows, the biggest losers are the winners. These are the people who, for some reason, catch the imagination of the public. They become fan favorites and find their public lives transformed with fans approaching them as they walk down Main Street. Actually, for weight loss, this can be a big plus because fans can embarrass people into keeping to a diet. Imagine how a participant in a weight loss show would feel if everyone pointed them out as they bought another donut. This would be a sure-fire way of motivating them to eat only healthy food.
Anyway, ABC has announced a new version of the same-old tired show. It’s to be called the Extreme Weight Loss Show. Note the touch of originality by adding “Extreme” to the title. You can always tell producers are desperate when they start using words like “extreme”. So the hook to convert the ordinary into the extreme is that each of the contestants in this competition must aim to lose an amazing amount of weight: the men must be on a program to lose not less than 200 pounds, the women not less than 150 pounds. Now the writer has a conceptual problem with these numbers. He weighs 170 pounds in total so the idea that someone could lose more than he weighs boggles his mind. Yet ABC expects the world to line up outside its doors in Nashville to volunteer their time and sweat. The lure of the fame or notoriety is just too great. Sorry, perhaps that should be the lure of the extreme cash prizes for the winner is just too great. It’s amazing how many people will humiliate themselves just to earn a dollar.
The show does have a realistic timeframe in mind. It is employing a team of personal trainers who will visit each contestant’s home to bully them into action. No reality show is complete without all those tears of frustration when contestants find their comfortable bubble punctured by aggressive trainers. The cameras will record these sessions and follow the contestants over a one year period. The person losing the most weight wins the prize. This is not unrealistic. It rules out all those who might try to starve themselves into a winning loss, offering a gentle and safe weight reduction approach. But only someone really motivated will keep to a high-intensity exercise program over a year. This is a fair test. Which brings us to phentermine because, when your motivation is running down and hunger is about to send you back into the kitchen for a soda and snacks, this drug steps into that gap in your stomach and sends out the message, “No” to the brain. Buy phentermine and find out why millions of people have lost weight over the last fifty years (and counting).
January 15th, 2010 in
Uncategorized |
No Comments
It seems the imagination of the people who work for TV corporations is limited to the same basic formula. Reality shows are big business. If you want to earn the maximum revenue from selling ad space on TV, have a group of people running round the world doing strange things in a search for suitcase dollars or follow a group of families as they compete against each other to see who can lose the most weight. In these shows, the biggest losers are the winners. They become fan favorites and find their public lives transformed with fans approaching them as they walk down Main Street. Actually, for weight loss, this can be a big plus because fans can embarrass people into keeping to a diet. Imagine how a participant in a weight loss show would feel if everyone pointed them out as they bought another donut.
Anyway, ABC has announced a new version of the same-old tired show. It’s to be called the Extreme Weight Loss Show. Note the touch of originality by adding “Extreme” to the title. You can always tell producers are desperate when they start using words like “extreme”. So the hook to convert the ordinary into the extreme is that each of the contestants in this competition must aim to lose an amazing amount of weight: the men must be on a program to lose not less than 200 pounds, the women not less than 150 pounds. Now the writer has a conceptual problem with these numbers. He weighs 170 pounds in total so the idea that someone could lose more than he weighs boggles his mind. Yet ABC expects the world to line up outside its doors in Nashville to volunteer their time and sweat. The lure of the fame or notoriety is just too great. Sorry, perhaps that should be the lure of the extreme cash prizes for the winner is just too great. It’s amazing how many people will humiliate themselves just to earn a dollar.
The show does have a realistic timeframe in mind. It is employing a team of personal trainers who will visit each contestant’s home to bully them into action. No reality show is complete without all those tears of frustration when contestants find their comfortable bubble punctured by aggressive trainers. The cameras will record these sessions and follow the contestants over a one year period. The person losing the most weight wins the prize. This is not unrealistic. It rules out all those who might try to starve themselves into a winning loss, offering a gentle and safe weight reduction approach. But only someone really motivated will keep to a high-intensity exercise program over a year. This is a fair test. Which brings us to phentermine because, when your motivation is running down and hunger is about to send you back into the kitchen for a soda and snacks, this drug steps into that gap in your stomach and sends out the message, “No” to the brain. Buy phentermine and find out why millions of people have lost weight over the last fifty years (and counting).
January 14th, 2010 in
Uncategorized |
No Comments